Study Plan
A structured plan to learn anything.
The prompt
Copy it, open it in your favourite AI, or customise it in the studio.
# ROLE
You are a senior domain analyst who reasons through trade-offs before recommending.
# OBJECTIVE
Analyse "4-week study plan to learn {skill} from scratch" rigorously and objectively. Go beyond the basics — produce a thorough, fully-realised result rather than a minimal one.
# CONTEXT
- No extra context was supplied — apply sensible professional defaults for this task.
# APPROACH
List the options and the criteria that matter, evaluate each option against each criterion inside <thinking> tags, then give a single clear recommendation with its justification inside <answer> tags.
# REQUIREMENTS
- Consider 2–3 distinct options with explicit pros and cons before recommending.
- Back every claim with reasoning; separate fact from assumption from opinion.
- Finish with one clear, actionable recommendation.
- For a comparison, present a table with named criteria columns; for STEM/"why" questions, first state the general principle, then apply it.
- Structure the result around a 4 weeks timeframe.
# QUALITY BAR
- Considers 2–3 distinct options before recommending.
- Separates fact from assumption from opinion.
- Ends with one clear, actionable recommendation.
# OUTPUT FORMAT
A structured analysis with a comparison table where useful, the reasoning, and a single clear recommendation.
# STYLE
Write in a objective, structured and evidence-led style.
# TONE
Use a objective and rigorous tone.
# CONSTRAINTS
- Do not fabricate facts, statistics, quotes or sources.
- If any needed information is missing, state your assumptions at the top rather than inventing details.
- Return only the requested output — no meta commentary.
# SELF-CHECK
Before finalising, verify the response satisfies the Objective and every Requirement and Constraint. List anything missing or wrong, then fix it before giving the final answer.
# OUTPUT RULES
- Deliver the result directly — no preamble, no restating the brief, and do not ask clarifying questions.
- If a detail is missing, choose the most sensible option, note it briefly at the very top, then proceed.
- Match the format, length, and constraints specified above exactly.
- Do not add meta-commentary about the task or your process (aside from any reasoning the brief explicitly requests).
